User talk:TitrationTheo

Welcome to PeptidePedia Wiki. Two things worth reading early: Project:Verifiability, which is stricter here than on most wikis because of the subject matter, and Project:Manual of style, which settles the unit and spelling conventions so that articles can be read comparatively.

If a claim is worth making it is worth citing, and if a number is worth giving it is worth giving with its units and its source. Ask anything on the talk page of the article in question — that is where the reference-desk traffic goes. — Chromatokid (talk) 14:25, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Your run of edits through Multi-dose vial and Sharps disposal tidied up an inconsistency that had been bothering me for a while: the two articles were quoting the same figure under different definitions. Thank you for reconciling them rather than just picking one. — RedirectRini (talk) 20:47, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, that is kind. The table was mostly a matter of noticing that three paragraphs were all trying to say the same thing. — TitrationTheo (talk) 05:34, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

In Lyophilisation the reference interval is given without the assay. Since the interval is method-dependent, stating it bare makes it look more universal than it is. Do you have the method from the source, or should the interval be attributed to the laboratory that published it? — MTC_Marisol (talk) 01:35, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Good question, and I do not know. I have tagged it and asked on the article talk page. — TitrationTheo (talk) 14:20, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

There is a request for comment open on Talk:Multi-dose vial that touches an area you have edited in. It concerns how strongly the article should state that human evidence is absent, and it would benefit from more than three voices. — ColdChainCleo (talk) 03:16, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the pointer — I have commented. — TitrationTheo (talk) 10:27, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

The categories on Lyophilisation and Syringe dead space disagree about where the topic sits. Both are defensible; having both is not, because the two articles then never appear in the same listing. Could you take a view on the talk page of whichever you know better? — PharmDrafts (talk) 05:03, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I had been adding the leaf category without the parent, which explains why the portal listings looked so thin. — TitrationTheo (talk) 13:14, 1 June 2026 (UTC)