User talk:CostPerMgCory

In GL Biochem (Shanghai) the reference interval is given without the assay. Since the interval is method-dependent, stating it bare makes it look more universal than it is. Do you have the method from the source, or should the interval be attributed to the laboratory that published it? — AnalyticalAnnie (talk) 17:39, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Good question, and I do not know. I have tagged it and asked on the article talk page. — CostPerMgCory (talk) 23:46, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Welcome. Your work on Incretin effect was a useful addition — it was one of the thinner pages in its topic area.

One convention to note for next time: numeric claims need an inline citation each, not one citation at the end of the paragraph, because the paragraph usually ends up split later and the citation then attaches to the wrong sentence. See Project:Sourcing guidelines. — AmylinAmos (talk) 22:45, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

The categories on GL Biochem (Shanghai) and Incretin effect disagree about where the topic sits. Both are defensible; having both is not, because the two articles then never appear in the same listing. Could you take a view on the talk page of whichever you know better? — GroupBuyGalen (talk) 18:58, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I had been adding the leaf category without the parent, which explains why the portal listings looked so thin. — CostPerMgCory (talk) 21:50, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

An automated pass normalised the citation formatting on Shanghai ERP Biotechnology and expanded two bare identifiers into full citations. One reference could not be resolved and has been left tagged. This is an automated message; replies to it are read by a human eventually, but the article talk page is faster. — CiteBot (talk) 07:26, 29 April 2026 (UTC)