User talk:SyringeSybille
Editor talk page·2 messages
Inference in Syringe dead space
The sentence you added to Syringe dead space draws a human conclusion from an animal study. That is the specific case Project:No original research is aimed at. Describing the study, its model and the absence of human data is both permitted and, I would argue, more informative than the inference. — BUD_Bertram (talk) 18:14, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
That is a fair reading of the policy. I have rewritten it to describe the study and to say plainly that no human data exists. — SyringeSybille (talk) 09:58, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Nice work across Beyond-use date and Glucagon-like peptide-1
Your run of edits through Beyond-use date and Glucagon-like peptide-1 tidied up an inconsistency that had been bothering me for a while: the two articles were quoting the same figure under different definitions. Thank you for reconciling them rather than just picking one. — TSH_Tallulah (talk) 02:00, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, that is kind. The table was mostly a matter of noticing that three paragraphs were all trying to say the same thing. — SyringeSybille (talk) 11:19, 20 July 2025 (UTC)