User talk:BlindSampleBrid

★ For sustained, careful work on WuXi TIDES and the articles around it — particularly for checking figures against their sources rather than against other articles, which is the slower and correct way round. Thank you. — FigureFerdinand (talk) 18:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Much appreciated. It is a slow way to work but it is the only way I trust. — BlindSampleBrid (talk) 19:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

The sentence you added to Bachem Holding (Suzhou) draws a human conclusion from an animal study. That is the specific case Project:No original research is aimed at. Describing the study, its model and the absence of human data is both permitted and, I would argue, more informative than the inference. — ArchiveBot (talk) 21:39, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

That is a fair reading of the policy. I have rewritten it to describe the study and to say plainly that no human data exists. — BlindSampleBrid (talk) 15:26, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

The diagram you added to Xi'an Mokemei Biotechnology is much clearer than the paragraph it replaced, and it is correctly labelled, which is rarer than it should be. If you have the patience for more of them, Special:WantedPages is not the right list but the portals each keep a "things you can do" box, and several ask for figures. — Chromatokid (talk) 13:24, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I will look at the portal boxes. — BlindSampleBrid (talk) 19:46, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

The reception section of Xi'an Mokemei Biotechnology currently reads more warmly than its sources support. Two of the four statements are attributed to community tallies, which per Project:Verifiability are weak evidence and must be labelled as such at each point of use. I have added the labels; the substance is unchanged. — CiteBot (talk) 14:32, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — BlindSampleBrid (talk) 06:11, 6 July 2026 (UTC)