Talk:Batch number
Discussion page·3 threads·no archives
This is the discussion page for the article Batch number. It is for improving the article: sources, wording, structure, scope and titles. It is not a general discussion forum about the subject, and it is not a place to ask for advice — see Project:Medical disclaimer.
Date-ordering checkResolved
The date-ordering check is the most useful thing on this page and it was buried in a bullet list. Suggest promoting it to its own sentence after the list. — BatchNumberBede (talk) 10:20, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Done — it now closes the section with an explicit note that it needs no expertise. ✓ Done — COA_Colwyn (talk) 13:50, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Inferring volume from sequence numbersDone
People do try to infer production volume from sequence numbers, and the article is right that it is unsound. Worth naming the specific reason: numbering scope is unknown. — LedgerLysander (talk) 09:35, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
Added — per-product, per-year, per-line or arbitrary. That covers the plausible schemes. ✓ Done — BatchNumberBede (talk) 12:55, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
Documentary observation versus allegation
The sentence separating "the paperwork does not hang together" from "the material is defective" should appear on every article in this cluster. It is the difference between an observation and an accusation. — AttributeAnders (talk) 11:45, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
It is in the working group's style note. I would rather it be applied consistently than copied verbatim, but the substance should be everywhere. — NPOV_Nadia (talk) 15:15, 28 June 2026 (UTC)