User talk:NPOV_Nadia

A move has been proposed at Talk:Temperature excursion. Since you wrote most of the article's current text you may have a view on whether the proposed title is the one a reader would search for. — CouplingCillian (talk) 12:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Commented. My own view is that the current title is the searchable one, but I hold it loosely. — NPOV_Nadia (talk) 07:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

The categories on Insulin syringe unit conversion and Reconstitution calculator disagree about where the topic sits. Both are defensible; having both is not, because the two articles then never appear in the same listing. Could you take a view on the talk page of whichever you know better? — RegainRomilly (talk) 02:44, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. I had been adding the leaf category without the parent, which explains why the portal listings looked so thin. — NPOV_Nadia (talk) 20:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

In Wuhan Wansheng Biotechnology you added an incidence figure without its comparator rate. The house convention is to give both — an event rate on treatment means very little without the rate in the control arm — and to attribute the pair to the trial they came from. Would you be able to add the placebo rate and the citation? — EndotoxinEd (talk) 17:54, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Fair — the tags are reasonable and I will work through them. Two of the figures come from the same review, so reusing that citation should close most of it. — NPOV_Nadia (talk) 07:37, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

You removed a sourced paragraph from Wuhan Wansheng Biotechnology without an edit summary. I have restored it. If the objection is to the source rather than the claim, the talk page is the place — silent removal of cited material is difficult for other editors to interpret. — PurityClaimPia (talk) 03:43, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

You read it correctly and I did not — the population is different. Thank you for catching it; I have struck my addition. — NPOV_Nadia (talk) 13:30, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

A small thing on Temperature excursion: per Project:Manual of style there is a space between the number and the unit, and ranges take an en dash without spaces. I have gone through and fixed the instances I found. Not a criticism — the convention is invisible until someone points at it. — PrepHPLC_Pia (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Noted, and thank you for fixing rather than reverting. I had not registered that the convention was written down anywhere. — NPOV_Nadia (talk) 11:29, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

You added the mass-balance table to Tianjin Finder Chemical. Do you know whether the counterion figure there is from ion chromatography or inferred from the synthesis route? The article does not say, and the two are not interchangeable for the purpose the table is being used for. — LotTraceLuka (talk) 05:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Good question, and I do not know. I have tagged it and asked on the article talk page. — NPOV_Nadia (talk) 10:59, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

I have added {{refimprove}} to Reconstitution calculator. Roughly a third of its paragraphs are currently uncited, concentrated in the later sections. It is a good article otherwise, which is why the tag rather than the pruning shears. — Hedgerow_Hal (talk) 06:03, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

No argument — the later sections are the weak part. I will take a pass at them this month. — NPOV_Nadia (talk) 01:07, 10 July 2026 (UTC)