PeptidePedia The community reference

User talk:COA_Colwyn

Editor talk page·5 messages

This is the talk page for the editor COA_Colwyn. Messages left here are public and are signed. Please add new messages at the bottom, and sign with four tildes.

Working group invitation

Given your edits around Shanghai ERP Biotechnology, you might find the working-group pages useful — Project:Analytical working group, Project:Pharmacology working group and Project:Clinical evidence working group each keep a short priority list, and the priorities are mostly things one person can finish in an afternoon. — Retention_Time_Rae (talk) 03:10, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, the priority lists are genuinely more useful than a general backlog. — COA_Colwyn (talk) 12:18, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Talk page archived

Threads on this page older than 120 days and marked resolved have been moved to an archive subpage. Unresolved threads were left in place regardless of age. This is an automated message. — StubSorterBot (talk) 03:28, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Lead of Bachem Holding (Suzhou)

The lead of Bachem Holding (Suzhou) has grown to five paragraphs and now contains material that appears nowhere in the body. Per Project:Manual of style the lead summarises the article rather than extending it. Rather than cut it myself I thought I would ask whether the extra material was meant to become a section. — LabelLibby (talk) 17:32, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Noted, and thank you for fixing rather than reverting. I had not registered that the convention was written down anywhere. — COA_Colwyn (talk) 02:48, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the work on WuXi TIDES

Just to say that WuXi TIDES is substantially better than it was a month ago. The table you added does the work that three paragraphs of prose were failing to do. — PrimarySrcPatia (talk) 00:19, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, that is kind. The table was mostly a matter of noticing that three paragraphs were all trying to say the same thing. — COA_Colwyn (talk) 15:27, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Assay for the reference interval in Bachem Holding (Suzhou)

In Bachem Holding (Suzhou) the reference interval is given without the assay. Since the interval is method-dependent, stating it bare makes it look more universal than it is. Do you have the method from the source, or should the interval be attributed to the laboratory that published it? — DisclosureDido (talk) 23:24, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Good question, and I do not know. I have tagged it and asked on the article talk page. — COA_Colwyn (talk) 11:52, 27 May 2026 (UTC)