User talk:VerifyFirstVida
Editor talk page·2 messages
Assay for the reference interval in Sangon Biotech
In Sangon Biotech the reference interval is given without the assay. Since the interval is method-dependent, stating it bare makes it look more universal than it is. Do you have the method from the source, or should the interval be attributed to the laboratory that published it? — SecondarySrc_Seb (talk) 07:29, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Good question, and I do not know. I have tagged it and asked on the article talk page. — VerifyFirstVida (talk) 19:01, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Neutrality of the reception section in GL Biochem (Shanghai)
The reception section of GL Biochem (Shanghai) currently reads more warmly than its sources support. Two of the four statements are attributed to community tallies, which per Project:Verifiability are weak evidence and must be labelled as such at each point of use. I have added the labels; the substance is unchanged. — UnderfillUna (talk) 15:57, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — VerifyFirstVida (talk) 00:31, 16 January 2026 (UTC)