PeptidePedia The community reference

User talk:IncretinIvo

Editor talk page·6 messages

This is the talk page for the editor IncretinIvo. Messages left here are public and are signed. Please add new messages at the bottom, and sign with four tildes.

Merge proposal affecting Hubei Jianxiang Bioscience

A merge of Xi'an Mokemei Biotechnology into Hubei Jianxiang Bioscience has been proposed. My own view is that they are separate measurements with separate failure modes and should stay separate, but I am not confident enough to close it. Comments welcome at the article talk page. SortKeySascha (talk) 07:18, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

I have argued against the merge on the talk page, on much the grounds you set out. IncretinIvo (talk) 22:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Neutrality of the reception section in Reconstitution calculator

The reception section of Reconstitution calculator currently reads more warmly than its sources support. Two of the four statements are attributed to community tallies, which per Project:Verifiability are weak evidence and must be labelled as such at each point of use. I have added the labels; the substance is unchanged. Chromatokid (talk) 10:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. IncretinIvo (talk) 00:38, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Removal of sourced content from Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide

You removed a sourced paragraph from Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide without an edit summary. I have restored it. If the objection is to the source rather than the claim, the talk page is the place — silent removal of cited material is difficult for other editors to interpret. BlankVialBo (talk) 14:49, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

You read it correctly and I did not — the population is different. Thank you for catching it; I have struck my addition. IncretinIvo (talk) 18:45, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

I think we disagree about Hubei Jianxiang Bioscience

We have now reverted each other twice on Hubei Jianxiang Bioscience, which is a sign that the disagreement is substantive rather than accidental. My reading is that the source supports the weaker of the two claims. Rather than continue in edit summaries, shall we put it on the article talk page and let someone else weigh in? BatchNumberBede (talk) 13:07, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Agreed, and I would rather be argued out of it than keep reverting. I have opened a section. IncretinIvo (talk) 10:31, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Talk page archived

Threads on this page older than 120 days and marked resolved have been moved to an archive subpage. Unresolved threads were left in place regardless of age. This is an automated message. StubSorterBot (talk) 23:20, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

The figure in Syringe dead space

The diagram you added to Syringe dead space is much clearer than the paragraph it replaced, and it is correctly labelled, which is rarer than it should be. If you have the patience for more of them, Special:WantedPages is not the right list but the portals each keep a "things you can do" box, and several ask for figures. DrTitration (talk) 05:44, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I will look at the portal boxes. IncretinIvo (talk) 12:58, 20 March 2026 (UTC)