User talk:UACR_Ulric
Editor talk page·2 messages
Citations on Shanghai Sigma-Audley New Material Technology
Thanks for expanding Shanghai Sigma-Audley New Material Technology. I have tagged two of the figures with — not because I doubt them, but because a reader cannot check them, and per Project:Verifiability that is the test. If the source is the review already cited further up, reusing that citation on the specific sentence is enough. — BlankVialBo (talk) 13:36, 24 January 2026 (UTC){{cn}}
Fair — the tags are reasonable and I will work through them. Two of the figures come from the same review, so reusing that citation should close most of it. — UACR_Ulric (talk) 16:41, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
For sustained, careful work on Multi-dose vial and the articles around it — particularly for checking figures against their sources rather than against other articles, which is the slower and correct way round. Thank you. — CapitalisationCaz (talk) 15:22, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
Much appreciated. It is a slow way to work but it is the only way I trust. — UACR_Ulric (talk) 06:02, 6 July 2026 (UTC)