User talk:PharmDrafts
Editor talk page·2 messages
Inference in Cold chain
The sentence you added to Cold chain draws a human conclusion from an animal study. That is the specific case Project:No original research is aimed at. Describing the study, its model and the absence of human data is both permitted and, I would argue, more informative than the inference. — StubSorterBot (talk) 02:01, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
That is a fair reading of the policy. I have rewritten it to describe the study and to say plainly that no human data exists. — PharmDrafts (talk) 06:50, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Source for the incidence figure in Cold chain
In Cold chain you added an incidence figure without its comparator rate. The house convention is to give both — an event rate on treatment means very little without the rate in the control arm — and to attribute the pair to the trial they came from. Would you be able to add the placebo rate and the citation? — FmocFrancis (talk) 20:04, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Fair — the tags are reasonable and I will work through them. Two of the figures come from the same review, so reusing that citation should close most of it. — PharmDrafts (talk) 11:36, 15 March 2026 (UTC)