User talk:LabelLibby
Editor talk page·2 messages
RfC you may want to see
There is a request for comment open on Talk:Bachem Holding (Suzhou) that touches an area you have edited in. It concerns how strongly the article should state that human evidence is absent, and it would benefit from more than three voices. — PrimarySrcPatia (talk) 18:44, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for the pointer — I have commented. — LabelLibby (talk) 11:17, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
I think we disagree about Bachem Holding (Suzhou)
We have now reverted each other twice on Bachem Holding (Suzhou), which is a sign that the disagreement is substantive rather than accidental. My reading is that the source supports the weaker of the two claims. Rather than continue in edit summaries, shall we put it on the article talk page and let someone else weigh in? — DisclosureDido (talk) 21:38, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Agreed, and I would rather be argued out of it than keep reverting. I have opened a section. — LabelLibby (talk) 07:31, 16 March 2026 (UTC)