User talk:OpenLabelOtto
Editor talk page·2 messages
Neutrality of the reception section in Sangon Biotech
The reception section of Sangon Biotech currently reads more warmly than its sources support. Two of the four statements are attributed to community tallies, which per Project:Verifiability are weak evidence and must be labelled as such at each point of use. I have added the labels; the substance is unchanged. — SPPS_Sorrel (talk) 15:30, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — OpenLabelOtto (talk) 19:31, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Automated notice: citation formatting on Sangon Biotech
An automated pass normalised the citation formatting on Sangon Biotech and expanded two bare identifiers into full citations. One reference could not be resolved and has been left tagged. This is an automated message; replies to it are read by a human eventually, but the article talk page is faster. — CategoryBot (talk) 13:11, 19 April 2026 (UTC)