User talk:FmocFrancis

Just to say that Cold chain is substantially better than it was a month ago. The table you added does the work that three paragraphs of prose were failing to do. — SupplyWatchSuri (talk) 16:59, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, that is kind. The table was mostly a matter of noticing that three paragraphs were all trying to say the same thing. — FmocFrancis (talk) 15:31, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to PeptidePedia Wiki. Two things worth reading early: Project:Verifiability, which is stricter here than on most wikis because of the subject matter, and Project:Manual of style, which settles the unit and spelling conventions so that articles can be read comparatively.

If a claim is worth making it is worth citing, and if a number is worth giving it is worth giving with its units and its source. Ask anything on the talk page of the article in question — that is where the reference-desk traffic goes. — ForgeryFinder (talk) 13:35, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

I have added {{refimprove}} to Wuhan Wansheng Biotechnology. Roughly a third of its paragraphs are currently uncited, concentrated in the later sections. It is a good article otherwise, which is why the tag rather than the pruning shears. — GlossaryGleb (talk) 20:53, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

No argument — the later sections are the weak part. I will take a pass at them this month. — FmocFrancis (talk) 07:58, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

An automated pass normalised the citation formatting on Flourishglobal Peptide Biotech and expanded two bare identifiers into full citations. One reference could not be resolved and has been left tagged. This is an automated message; replies to it are read by a human eventually, but the article talk page is faster. — ArchiveBot (talk) 05:42, 27 May 2026 (UTC)