User talk:BaselineBex
Editor talk page·4 messages
Lead of Shanghai Wibson Biotechnology
The lead of Shanghai Wibson Biotechnology has grown to five paragraphs and now contains material that appears nowhere in the body. Per Project:Manual of style the lead summarises the article rather than extending it. Rather than cut it myself I thought I would ask whether the extra material was meant to become a section. — NPOV_Nadia (talk) 05:58, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Noted, and thank you for fixing rather than reverting. I had not registered that the convention was written down anywhere. — BaselineBex (talk) 14:28, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for the work on Beyond-use date
Just to say that Beyond-use date is substantially better than it was a month ago. The table you added does the work that three paragraphs of prose were failing to do. — ArchiveBot (talk) 03:41, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, that is kind. The table was mostly a matter of noticing that three paragraphs were all trying to say the same thing. — BaselineBex (talk) 14:52, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
Your edit to Beyond-use date
I have reverted your recent change to Beyond-use date. The source cited does report the number, but it reports it for a different population than the sentence now claims. If I have misread the paper, please say so on the article talk page and I will restore it — I would rather be corrected than leave it wrong in either direction. — LyophilLena (talk) 00:05, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
You read it correctly and I did not — the population is different. Thank you for catching it; I have struck my addition. — BaselineBex (talk) 13:17, 10 April 2026 (UTC)