PeptidePedia The community reference

Talk:Third-party testing

Discussion page·4 threads·1 archive

This article is within the scope of the quality and testing working group.
Rated A-class. Frequently linked; changes to the three-questions list should be raised here.

This is the discussion page for the article Third-party testing. It is for improving the article: sources, wording, structure, scope and titles. It is not a general discussion forum about the subject, and it is not a place to ask for advice — see Project:Medical disclaimer.

Should the service comparison table rank them?Done

The table lists what each service produces without evaluating any of them. Is that the right call, or should the article say something about relative rigour? — TallySheetTad (talk) 11:05, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Right call. They produce different kinds of object; ranking them would require a criterion the wiki has no basis for choosing. Describing what each does lets a reader decide what they need. ✓ Done — NPOV_Nadia (talk) 14:35, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Done. This thread is closed. Reopening it is fine if new sources appear; please add a new subsection rather than editing the closed discussion.

Self-selection in our own tally

Good that the article applies the self-selection caveat to our own community tally rather than only to other people's data. — DisclosureDido (talk) 09:15, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

It is the same caveat, and exempting ourselves from it would be indefensible. The tally page carries it too. — TallySheetTad (talk) 12:40, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

This page was last edited on 30 June 2026, by TallySheetTad. Text is available under the PeptidePedia Wiki Content Licence (PPCL-BY-SA 4.0).