Talk:Sangon Biotech / Archive 1
Archived discussion·1 closed thread
Scope: is this a peptide supplier article at all?Resolved
This organisation's peptide listings are one line in a much broader life-science catalogue. Categorising it under Category:Peptide suppliers alongside entities that do nothing else is arguably a misclassification, and an article framed as a supplier profile misdescribes what it is. — — ScopeSeverin (talk) 11:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
The category is defensible — it does supply peptides — but the framing point is right. The article should say in its first sentence that the peptide business is one line among several, and it now does. — — ParentCatPansy (talk) 14:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Support. It also strengthens the notability case rather than weakening it: an organisation describable from technical contexts unrelated to this trade meets criterion 4 in a way most of these do not. — — NotabilityNoa (talk) 09:52, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Framing sentence added and the categorisation stands. ✓ Resolved — — ScopeSeverin (talk) 10:26, 11 January 2025 (UTC)