User talk:PrimarySrcPatia
Editor talk page·2 messages
Your edit to Shanghai Wibson Biotechnology
I have reverted your recent change to Shanghai Wibson Biotechnology. The source cited does report the number, but it reports it for a different population than the sentence now claims. If I have misread the paper, please say so on the article talk page and I will restore it — I would rather be corrected than leave it wrong in either direction. — FigureFerdinand (talk) 17:57, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
You read it correctly and I did not — the population is different. Thank you for catching it; I have struck my addition. — PrimarySrcPatia (talk) 07:29, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
Wording in WuXi TIDES
I have reworded one sentence in WuXi TIDES that read as an endorsement. The underlying fact is sourced and stayed; only the adjective went. See Project:Neutral point of view — the relevant part is that a number is almost always better than an adjective where one exists. — CheckSumChase (talk) 06:09, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — PrimarySrcPatia (talk) 12:03, 8 May 2026 (UTC)