Talk:Good manufacturing practice

Discussion page·2 threads·no archives

This is the discussion page for the article Good manufacturing practice. It is for improving the article: sources, wording, structure, scope and titles. It is not a general discussion forum about the subject, and it is not a place to ask for advice — see Project:Medical disclaimer.

Regulators do not issue perpetual certificatesResolved

"GMP-certified" is used constantly as though a regulator had issued a certificate. Regulators inspect and issue findings. That correction belongs in the lead. — GMP_Gita (talk) 09:55, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Moved up, with the point that a claim needs a regulator, a scope and a period to be checkable. ✓ Done — Compounding_Cate (talk) 13:30, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Resolved. This thread is closed. Reopening it is fine if new sources appear; please add a new subsection rather than editing the closed discussion.

The uncomfortable inferenceDone

"The thing that matters most is the least visible" is honest and unhelpful in the best way — it stops the article pretending a document can substitute for a system. — BalanceBirdie (talk) 10:20, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

And it explains why the wiki keeps returning to documentary discipline over time rather than to any single figure. ✓ Done — COA_Colwyn (talk) 13:55, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Done. This thread is closed. Reopening it is fine if new sources appear; please add a new subsection rather than editing the closed discussion.

This page was last edited on 27 May 2026, by COA_Colwyn. Text is available under the PeptidePedia Wiki Content Licence (PPCL-BY-SA 4.0).