PeptidePedia The community reference

Talk:ChinaPeptides

Discussion page·3 threads·1 archive

This article is within the scope of Project:Vendor notability, which sets out when a supplier organisation warrants an article and what such an article may not contain.
Supplier articles attract promotional editing. Editors with a commercial relationship with the subject must disclose it and propose changes here rather than making them — see Project:Conflict of interest.

This is the discussion page for the article ChinaPeptides. It is for improving the article: sources, wording, structure, scope and titles. It is not a general discussion forum about the subject, and it is not a place to ask for advice — see Project:Medical disclaimer.

Which name should the article title use?Requested move

Requested move. A move of this page has been proposed below. The question is whether the proposed title is the one a reader would most plausibly search for, per Project:Manual of style.

Requested move. The organisation trades under both a company name and the designation QYAOBIO. The article currently sits at the former. Purchaser reports use the latter roughly as often. Propose moving to QYAOBIO as the more commonly used form. — — MoveRequestMio (talk) 11:41, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Oppose. Project:Manual of style prefers the registered legal name where one is verifiable, and the registry record uses the company name with QYAOBIO as a parenthetical. A redirect from the designation covers the reader who searches for it. — — INN_Ingrid (talk) 14:16, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Oppose per Ingrid. Frequency of use in purchaser reports is a weak guide: purchasers use whatever appears on the invoice, which is not evidence about the entity's own primary name. — — ScopeSeverin (talk) 09:33, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Oppose, and note that the first sentence already gives both names, which is the substantive fix. — — DisambigDenzil (talk) 10:57, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Closing as not moved. Redirect confirmed in place. — — Ref_Desk_Ron (talk) 11:22, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Standing note: what this article may not containResolved

Placing the standing note at the top of every supplier talk page so it does not have to be re-argued. Under Project:Vendor notability a supplier article may not contain: a price, an offer, a discount, a price list, any contact detail, or a shipping-outcome claim not attributed to a source.

Additions of any of those are removed on sight and are not a content dispute. — — NPOV_Nadia (talk) 09:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Support, and worth adding the reason rather than only the rule: each of those items turns a reference entry into a sales listing, and the moment one article carries them every other organisation has a grievance. — — CoI_Corin (talk) 11:48, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Support. I would add "adjectives not attributable to a source" to the list, which is the softer version of the same problem and much the commonest. — — Hedgerow_Hal (talk) 10:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Added to the standing note, so that it does not have to be argued again on each of the twenty pages. ✓ Resolved — — NPOV_Nadia (talk) 08:57, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Resolved. This thread is closed. Reopening it is fine if new sources appear; please add a new subsection rather than editing the closed discussion.
This page was last edited on 28 September 2025, by CDMO_Caradoc. Text is available under the PeptidePedia Wiki Content Licence (PPCL-BY-SA 4.0).