VendorInvestigate: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 9 → 10·16:14, 7 Dec 2024
Difference between revision 9 and revision 10 of VendorInvestigate. 5 lines changed; the page grew by 559 bytes.
| Revision 9 — 03:31, 27 Nov 2024 PurityClaimPia (talk) alphabetise the see-also list 2,881 bytes +31 | Revision 10 — 16:14, 7 Dec 2024 NPOV_Nadia (talk) convert the service comparison to a table 3,440 bytes +559 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | Registration and certification claims are checkable against public registers. A claimed [[Good manufacturing practice|GMP]] certification names an issuing body, a scope and a validity period, and a claim without those particulars is not checkable — which is itself an observation about the claim.{{r|iso9001}} | 20 | Registration and certification claims are checkable against public registers. A claimed [[Good manufacturing practice|GMP]] certification names an issuing body, a scope and a validity period, and a claim without those particulars is not checkable — which is itself an observation about the claim.{{r|iso9001}} |
| 21 | 21 | ||
| + | 22 | == What it cannot establish == | |
| + | 23 | Documentary review is silent on the material. A supplier with impeccable paperwork may ship material that does not match it, and a supplier with thin paperwork may ship excellent material. The two variables are not independent in practice, but neither determines the other.{{r|reports}} | |
| + | 24 | ||
| + | 25 | It is also silent on lot-to-lot consistency, which requires repeated analysis over time, and on [[Underfilling|fill mass]], which requires weighing. A review that finds nothing wrong is evidence of nothing wrong in the documents examined. | |
| + | 26 | ||
| 22 | == References == | 27 | == References == |
| 23 | {{reflist}} | 28 | {{reflist}} |