User talk:ShortageShona
Editor talk page·4 messages
Inference in Qingdao Saber Technology Pharmaceutical
The sentence you added to Qingdao Saber Technology Pharmaceutical draws a human conclusion from an animal study. That is the specific case Project:No original research is aimed at. Describing the study, its model and the absence of human data is both permitted and, I would argue, more informative than the inference. — VerifyFirstVida (talk) 00:02, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
That is a fair reading of the policy. I have rewritten it to describe the study and to say plainly that no human data exists. — ShortageShona (talk) 10:52, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Category tree around Insulin syringe unit conversion
The categories on Insulin syringe unit conversion and Syringe dead space disagree about where the topic sits. Both are defensible; having both is not, because the two articles then never appear in the same listing. Could you take a view on the talk page of whichever you know better? — NeutralNikolai (talk) 20:35, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
Thank you. I had been adding the leaf category without the parent, which explains why the portal listings looked so thin. — ShortageShona (talk) 04:53, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
Your recent edits to Syringe dead space have consistently favoured one organisation, and one of them added promotional wording. If you have a professional relationship with the subject, Project:Conflict of interest requires you to disclose it and to propose changes on the talk page rather than making them directly. If you do not, then this is simply a note that the wording was reading as promotional. — LyophilLena (talk) 21:54, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
To be clear: I have no relationship with the subject. I take the point about the wording and have rephrased it. — ShortageShona (talk) 10:44, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
Maintenance tag on Syringe dead space
I have added to Syringe dead space. Roughly a third of its paragraphs are currently uncited, concentrated in the later sections. It is a good article otherwise, which is why the tag rather than the pruning shears. — SyringeSybille (talk) 10:57, 24 May 2026 (UTC){{refimprove}}
No argument — the later sections are the weak part. I will take a pass at them this month. — ShortageShona (talk) 02:46, 25 May 2026 (UTC)