User talk:NauseaNoor

Welcome. Your work on Trial data comparison was a useful addition — it was one of the thinner pages in its topic area.

One convention to note for next time: numeric claims need an inline citation each, not one citation at the end of the paragraph, because the paragraph usually ends up split later and the citation then attaches to the wrong sentence. See Project:Sourcing guidelines. — Chromatokid (talk) 23:49, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Lyophilisation was in Category:Purification but not in its parent chain, so it was invisible from the topic portal. I have fixed it. If you are adding categories in bulk, Special:WantedPages lists the ones that are currently claimed by articles but have no page. — COA_Colwyn (talk) 08:04, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. I had been adding the leaf category without the parent, which explains why the portal listings looked so thin. — NauseaNoor (talk) 15:01, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

A merge of Lyophilisation into Trial data comparison has been proposed. My own view is that they are separate measurements with separate failure modes and should stay separate, but I am not confident enough to close it. Comments welcome at the article talk page. — PioneerPerdita (talk) 15:34, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

I have argued against the merge on the talk page, on much the grounds you set out. — NauseaNoor (talk) 10:27, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

I have reverted your recent change to Lyophilisation. The source cited does report the number, but it reports it for a different population than the sentence now claims. If I have misread the paper, please say so on the article talk page and I will restore it — I would rather be corrected than leave it wrong in either direction. — CouplingCillian (talk) 15:08, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

You read it correctly and I did not — the population is different. Thank you for catching it; I have struck my addition. — NauseaNoor (talk) 10:47, 5 March 2026 (UTC)