User talk:LyophilLena
Editor talk page·2 messages
I think we disagree about Sharps disposal
We have now reverted each other twice on Sharps disposal, which is a sign that the disagreement is substantive rather than accidental. My reading is that the source supports the weaker of the two claims. Rather than continue in edit summaries, shall we put it on the article talk page and let someone else weigh in? — EscalationEira (talk) 05:54, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Agreed, and I would rather be argued out of it than keep reverting. I have opened a section. — LyophilLena (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Beyond-use date
A move has been proposed at Talk:Beyond-use date. Since you wrote most of the article's current text you may have a view on whether the proposed title is the one a reader would search for. — SurvodutideSaff (talk) 20:12, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Commented. My own view is that the current title is the searchable one, but I hold it loosely. — LyophilLena (talk) 09:28, 11 September 2025 (UTC)