User talk:IpamorelinIsold
Editor talk page·2 messages
Citations on Insulin syringe unit conversion
Thanks for expanding Insulin syringe unit conversion. I have tagged two of the figures with — not because I doubt them, but because a reader cannot check them, and per Project:Verifiability that is the test. If the source is the review already cited further up, reusing that citation on the specific sentence is enough. — ReceptorRhoda (talk) 16:58, 11 February 2026 (UTC){{cn}}
Fair — the tags are reasonable and I will work through them. Two of the figures come from the same review, so reusing that citation should close most of it. — IpamorelinIsold (talk) 15:53, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
Wording in Insulin syringe unit conversion
I have reworded one sentence in Insulin syringe unit conversion that read as an endorsement. The underlying fact is sourced and stayed; only the adjective went. See Project:Neutral point of view — the relevant part is that a number is almost always better than an adjective where one exists. — ChromCleanupCass (talk) 23:13, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — IpamorelinIsold (talk) 02:17, 23 June 2026 (UTC)