User talk:FirstEditFabian
Editor talk page·2 messages
Neutrality of the reception section in Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide
The reception section of Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide currently reads more warmly than its sources support. Two of the four statements are attributed to community tallies, which per Project:Verifiability are weak evidence and must be labelled as such at each point of use. I have added the labels; the substance is unchanged. — IncretinIvo (talk) 05:17, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — FirstEditFabian (talk) 07:28, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Wording in Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide
I have reworded one sentence in Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide that read as an endorsement. The underlying fact is sourced and stayed; only the adjective went. See Project:Neutral point of view — the relevant part is that a number is almost always better than an adjective where one exists. — IncretinIvo (talk) 18:59, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — FirstEditFabian (talk) 00:17, 20 June 2026 (UTC)