User talk:DiagramDelphine

Welcome to PeptidePedia Wiki. Two things worth reading early: Project:Verifiability, which is stricter here than on most wikis because of the subject matter, and Project:Manual of style, which settles the unit and spelling conventions so that articles can be read comparatively.

If a claim is worth making it is worth citing, and if a number is worth giving it is worth giving with its units and its source. Ask anything on the talk page of the article in question — that is where the reference-desk traffic goes. — ReportReaderRilla (talk) 07:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

The reception section of Cold chain currently reads more warmly than its sources support. Two of the four statements are attributed to community tallies, which per Project:Verifiability are weak evidence and must be labelled as such at each point of use. I have added the labels; the substance is unchanged. — StubSorterBot (talk) 21:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — DiagramDelphine (talk) 14:06, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

★ For sustained, careful work on Cold chain and the articles around it — particularly for checking figures against their sources rather than against other articles, which is the slower and correct way round. Thank you. — Ref_Desk_Ron (talk) 13:26, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Much appreciated. It is a slow way to work but it is the only way I trust. — DiagramDelphine (talk) 03:11, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

The diagram you added to Qingdao Sigma Chemical is much clearer than the paragraph it replaced, and it is correctly labelled, which is rarer than it should be. If you have the patience for more of them, Special:WantedPages is not the right list but the portals each keep a "things you can do" box, and several ask for figures. — BlindSampleBrid (talk) 05:51, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. I will look at the portal boxes. — DiagramDelphine (talk) 18:49, 11 November 2025 (UTC)