User talk:DMF_Dermot

There is a request for comment open on Talk:Hubei Jianxiang Bioscience that touches an area you have edited in. It concerns how strongly the article should state that human evidence is absent, and it would benefit from more than three voices. — PrimarySrcPatia (talk) 19:21, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the pointer — I have commented. — DMF_Dermot (talk) 13:29, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

The reception section of Hunan Aslsen Technology currently reads more warmly than its sources support. Two of the four statements are attributed to community tallies, which per Project:Verifiability are weak evidence and must be labelled as such at each point of use. I have added the labels; the substance is unchanged. — BlankVialBo (talk) 20:50, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — DMF_Dermot (talk) 04:52, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

A small thing on Shanghai ERP Biotechnology: per Project:Manual of style there is a space between the number and the unit, and ranges take an en dash without spaces. I have gone through and fixed the instances I found. Not a criticism — the convention is invisible until someone points at it. — IncretinIvo (talk) 10:57, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Noted, and thank you for fixing rather than reverting. I had not registered that the convention was written down anywhere. — DMF_Dermot (talk) 17:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)