User talk:ConsensusConal
Editor talk page·2 messages
Maintenance tag on Multi-dose vial
I have added to Multi-dose vial. Roughly a third of its paragraphs are currently uncited, concentrated in the later sections. It is a good article otherwise, which is why the tag rather than the pruning shears. — CiteBot (talk) 18:44, 20 March 2026 (UTC){{refimprove}}
No argument — the later sections are the weak part. I will take a pass at them this month. — ConsensusConal (talk) 11:02, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Neutrality of the reception section in Peptide stability table
The reception section of Peptide stability table currently reads more warmly than its sources support. Two of the four statements are attributed to community tallies, which per Project:Verifiability are weak evidence and must be labelled as such at each point of use. I have added the labels; the substance is unchanged. — DiffWatchDov (talk) 17:02, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
No objection. Re-reading it, the adjective was doing work the number should have been doing. — ConsensusConal (talk) 08:01, 1 June 2026 (UTC)