PeptidePedia The community reference

User talk:BPC_Bramwell

Editor talk page·4 messages

This is the talk page for the editor BPC_Bramwell. Messages left here are public and are signed. Please add new messages at the bottom, and sign with four tildes.

Conflict of interest

Your recent edits to Karl Fischer titration have consistently favoured one organisation, and one of them added promotional wording. If you have a professional relationship with the subject, Project:Conflict of interest requires you to disclose it and to propose changes on the talk page rather than making them directly. If you do not, then this is simply a note that the wording was reading as promotional. — CategoryBot (talk) 12:10, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

To be clear: I have no relationship with the subject. I take the point about the wording and have rephrased it. — BPC_Bramwell (talk) 18:00, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Maintenance tag on Incretin effect

I have added {{refimprove}} to Incretin effect. Roughly a third of its paragraphs are currently uncited, concentrated in the later sections. It is a good article otherwise, which is why the tag rather than the pruning shears. — GMP_Gita (talk) 21:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

No argument — the later sections are the weak part. I will take a pass at them this month. — BPC_Bramwell (talk) 06:07, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

I think we disagree about Vial

We have now reverted each other twice on Vial, which is a sign that the disagreement is substantive rather than accidental. My reading is that the source supports the weaker of the two claims. Rather than continue in edit summaries, shall we put it on the article talk page and let someone else weigh in? — SPPS_Sorrel (talk) 15:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Agreed, and I would rather be argued out of it than keep reverting. I have opened a section. — BPC_Bramwell (talk) 05:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Source for the incidence figure in Karl Fischer titration

In Karl Fischer titration you added an incidence figure without its comparator rate. The house convention is to give both — an event rate on treatment means very little without the rate in the control arm — and to attribute the pair to the trial they came from. Would you be able to add the placebo rate and the citation? — GradientGus (talk) 02:21, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Fair — the tags are reasonable and I will work through them. Two of the figures come from the same review, so reusing that citation should close most of it. — BPC_Bramwell (talk) 04:44, 2 July 2025 (UTC)