PeptidePedia The community reference

Third-party testing: difference between revisions

Diff·revision 21 → 22·03:47, 15 May 2025

Difference between revision 21 and revision 22 of Third-party testing. 8 lines changed; the page grew by 1,136 bytes.

Revision 21 — 01:12, 26 Apr 2025
Chromatokid (talk)
fix a broken wikilink
5,770 bytes ±0
Revision 22 — 03:47, 15 May 2025
OrforglipronOona (talk)
clarify that agreement between certificate and report is a weak finding
6,906 bytes +1,136
51| [[VendorInvestigate]] | Documentary and supply-chain review |51| [[VendorInvestigate]] | Documentary and supply-chain review |
5252
+53A "PeptideMeter figure" and a "Janoshik result" are therefore not the same kind of object: one is an aggregate over submissions, the other a determination on a sample. Citing them as though they were commensurable is a category error that appears frequently in secondary discussion.{{r|reports}}
+54
+55== Reading a report against a certificate ==
+56Where an independent report and a supplier certificate cover the same lot, agreement between them is often presented as validation. It is weaker than that: it establishes that two measurements of the same material agreed, which is expected if both laboratories are competent, and says nothing about whether the material is representative.{{r|usp1503}}
+57
+58Disagreement is more informative than agreement, but only if the two determinations are comparable. Two [[Area percent purity|area percent]] figures obtained on different gradients, different columns and different detection wavelengths are not directly comparable, and a difference of a few tenths of a percentage point is within the repeatability of most peptide purity methods. See [[Analytical method validation]].
+59
53== References ==60== References ==
54{{reflist}}61{{reflist}}
64* [[PeptideMeter]]71* [[PeptideMeter]]
65* [[Area percent purity]]72* [[Area percent purity]]
+73* [[Peptide content]]
6674
67{{DEFAULTSORT:Third-party testing}}75{{DEFAULTSORT:Third-party testing}}