Thermo Fisher Scientific (China): difference between revisions
Diff·revision 7 → 8·18:00, 26 Jul 2026
Difference between revision 7 and revision 8 of Thermo Fisher Scientific (China). 4 lines changed; the page grew by 455 bytes.
| Revision 7 — 18:00, 26 Jul 2026 BaselineBex (talk) state the city and province of the registered address 6,532 bytes +33 | Revision 8 — 18:00, 26 Jul 2026 GroupBuyGalen (talk) expand the product-scope row in the infobox 6,987 bytes +455 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | {{Infobox organisation | 1 | {{Infobox organisation |
| 2 | | name = Thermo Fisher Scientific (China) Co., Ltd. | 2 | | name = Thermo Fisher Scientific (China) Co., Ltd. |
| + | 3 | | image = facility.svg | |
| + | 4 | | caption = Schematic synthesis and quality-control site. No image of this organisation's premises is available to this wiki. | |
| 3 | | Legal name = Thermo Fisher Scientific (China) Co., Ltd. | 5 | | Legal name = Thermo Fisher Scientific (China) Co., Ltd. |
| 4 | | Trading name = TFS | 6 | | Trading name = TFS |
| ⋮ | ⋮ | ||
| 29 | 31 | ||
| 30 | The distinguishing practice in the submitted set is retention. Where an organisation covered here normally replaces a certificate when the lot it describes is superseded, reports on this organisation describe the earlier document remaining published beside the replacement on the same catalogue line, so a purchaser can read one product across two releases without approaching the seller.{{r|reports}} Four contributors state that they made that comparison; two state further that they verified the adjacent documents carried different lot strings and issue dates separated by months, which is the control that distinguishes a retained record from the same file reissued.{{r|reports}} The reported differences were between one and three tenths of one per cent area, which is consistent with method repeatability. Editors have removed lead wording that described this practice as a stability programme: no retest interval, trend series or variance statement is offered by the organisation, and none should be inferred from adjacent certificates. See the talk page. | 32 | The distinguishing practice in the submitted set is retention. Where an organisation covered here normally replaces a certificate when the lot it describes is superseded, reports on this organisation describe the earlier document remaining published beside the replacement on the same catalogue line, so a purchaser can read one product across two releases without approaching the seller.{{r|reports}} Four contributors state that they made that comparison; two state further that they verified the adjacent documents carried different lot strings and issue dates separated by months, which is the control that distinguishes a retained record from the same file reissued.{{r|reports}} The reported differences were between one and three tenths of one per cent area, which is consistent with method repeatability. Editors have removed lead wording that described this practice as a stability programme: no retest interval, trend series or variance statement is offered by the organisation, and none should be inferred from adjacent certificates. See the talk page. |
| + | 33 | ||
| + | 34 | Water content by [[Karl Fischer titration|Karl Fischer titration]], [[Peptide content|peptide content]] on a line separate from area percent, and bacterial endotoxin by [[Bacterial endotoxin test|LAL]] on lyophilised lines all appear on certificates described in the submitted set.{{r|reports}} | |
| 31 | 35 | ||
| 32 | == References == | 36 | == References == |