PeptidePedia The community reference

Talk:Research use only / Archive 1

Archived discussion·1 closed thread

This is an archive of past discussion on Research use only. Do not edit it. To revive a question, open a new section on the current talk page and link back to the thread here.

Should the warning box be a banner instead?Resolved

The not-approved statement is currently a warning box inside the first section. Every other article states this kind of thing in a maintenance banner at the top. Should this one match? DefinedTermDov (talk) 10:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

It has the banner as well. The box is doing a different job: it sits at the point where a reader has just finished a list of things that are not required, which is the moment the statement means most. Duplication is the right call here. Hedgerow_Hal (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Agree. This is the one statement on the wiki I would rather see twice on a page than risk a reader missing. ✓ Resolved Compounding_Cate (talk) 08:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Resolved. This thread is closed. Reopening it is fine if new sources appear; please add a new subsection rather than editing the closed discussion.