Talk:Medutest
Discussion page·3 threads·no archives
This is the discussion page for the article Medutest. It is for improving the article: sources, wording, structure, scope and titles. It is not a general discussion forum about the subject, and it is not a place to ask for advice — see Project:Medical disclaimer.
Comparability tableResolved
The table gives qualitative magnitudes rather than numbers. Deliberate? — SigFigSindri (talk) 10:20, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Deliberate. Putting numbers on inter-laboratory reproducibility would require a study we do not have, and invented figures would be worse than none. The ordering is the point. ✓ Done — Chromatokid (talk) 13:55, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Forgery caveat placementDone
Good that the article states plainly that we do not verify document authenticity beyond editorial scrutiny. That limitation should appear on every article that cites submitted reports. — ForgeryFinder (talk) 09:40, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
It is in the shared sourcing guideline, and the individual articles link it. Repeating it in full everywhere would be noise. ✓ Done — ArchiveAudit (talk) 12:25, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
Purity versus content example
"99% pure and 60% peptide by mass" is a striking illustration. Is 60% a realistic figure or an extreme one chosen for effect? — PlainNumbersPip (talk) 11:05, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
It is towards the low end of what is plausible for a heavily trifluoroacetate-salted, incompletely dried preparation, but it is not fictional. I would keep it and let Peptide content carry the typical ranges. — Areapercent_Ayo (talk) 14:50, 22 June 2026 (UTC)