Good manufacturing practice: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 21 → 22·06:54, 13 Jul 2025
Difference between revision 21 and revision 22 of Good manufacturing practice. 2 lines changed; the page grew by 222 bytes.
| Revision 21 — 06:51, 25 Jun 2025 ImportPolicyIggy (talk) space between number and unit per PP:MOS 4,901 bytes ±0 | Revision 22 — 06:54, 13 Jul 2025 ImportRecordIna (talk) state that the position differs between jurisdictions and give two examples 5,123 bytes +222 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | For a purchaser who can see only the document, this is uncomfortable: the thing that matters most is the least visible. What is visible is the documentary discipline the system produces — lot-specific certificates, retrievable records, named methods, consistency over time — and that visibility is why those features are worth attention.{{r|usp1503}} | 41 | For a purchaser who can see only the document, this is uncomfortable: the thing that matters most is the least visible. What is visible is the documentary discipline the system produces — lot-specific certificates, retrievable records, named methods, consistency over time — and that visibility is why those features are worth attention.{{r|usp1503}} |
| 42 | 42 | ||
| + | 43 | The inference runs one way only. Good documentation is consistent with a good system and is also achievable without one; poor documentation establishes little about the material. See [[Test report forgery]].{{r|reports}} | |
| + | 44 | ||
| 43 | == References == | 45 | == References == |
| 44 | {{reflist}} | 46 | {{reflist}} |