Batch number: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 21 → 22·09:39, 31 Aug 2025
Difference between revision 21 and revision 22 of Batch number. 2 lines changed; the page grew by 287 bytes.
| Revision 21 — 23:29, 2 Aug 2025 TallySheetTad (talk) add the chain-of-custody point to §Limitations 4,286 bytes ±0 | Revision 22 — 09:39, 31 Aug 2025 ForgeryFinder (talk) split overlong sentence 4,573 bytes +287 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 37 | It also does not survive [[Repackaging|repackaging]] unless the repackager records the original identifier. A vial relabelled with a new identifier and no back-reference has been disconnected from every determination ever made on the material it contains. | 37 | It also does not survive [[Repackaging|repackaging]] unless the repackager records the original identifier. A vial relabelled with a new identifier and no back-reference has been disconnected from every determination ever made on the material it contains. |
| 38 | 38 | ||
| + | 39 | For material bought outside licensed supply, the batch number is nonetheless the most useful single field on a label, because it is the field against which everything else can be checked for consistency. Its absence removes the possibility of any documentary check at all.{{r|reports}} | |
| + | 40 | ||
| 39 | == References == | 41 | == References == |
| 40 | {{reflist}} | 42 | {{reflist}} |