PeptidePedia The community reference

Trial data comparison (revision 11)

Old revision·18:13, 12 Jan 2025·WeaselWordWim

This is an old revision of this page, as it stood at 18:13, 12 Jan 2025, saved by WeaselWordWim with the summary rv unexplained removal of sourced content. It may differ substantially from the current revision, and any error it contains may since have been corrected.
Trial data comparison
RowsMajor randomised trials of incretin agonists
ColumnsPopulation, n, duration, comparator, endpoint, result
Reference tool infobox · conventions

The trial data comparison tabulates the principal published results of the major randomised trials of GLP-1 receptor agonists and related compounds, so that a reader arriving at one figure can see the others alongside it. Each row is attributed to its trial, arm, duration and comparator.

The table is easy to misread in one specific way, and the article exists partly to prevent it. Two figures from two trials are not a comparison of two drugs. Trial populations differ in baseline weight, glycaemic status, diabetes duration, background therapy and geography; durations differ; and the statistical estimand used to summarise a weight-change endpoint differs between publications and sometimes within a single one.[1] A larger number in this table means a larger result in that trial, and nothing more.

The comparison

[edit]

Filter by compound, trial programme or endpoint type. The bar is drawn to the magnitude of the primary result and is scaled within its endpoint type only.

References

  1. ^ International Council for Harmonisation, E9(R1): Addendum on Estimands and Sensitivity Analysis in Clinical Trials (2019).