Subcutaneous injection: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 1 → 2·14:37, 10 Aug 2024
Difference between revision 1 and revision 2 of Subcutaneous injection. 5 lines changed; the page grew by 642 bytes.
| Revision 1 — 09:00, 4 Aug 2024 LabRangeLindy (talk) new article: dosing and handling, expansion welcome 1,450 bytes +1,450 | Revision 2 — 14:37, 10 Aug 2024 AnalyticalAnnie (talk) give the concentration in mg/mL as well as in units 2,092 bytes +642 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | The route suits peptides for two reasons. Absorption is largely by capillary and lymphatic uptake, which handles large molecules that would be destroyed in the gut; and the depot behaviour of the tissue smooths the concentration profile, which is desirable for a drug intended to act over days.{{r|richter2012}} | 11 | The route suits peptides for two reasons. Absorption is largely by capillary and lymphatic uptake, which handles large molecules that would be destroyed in the gut; and the depot behaviour of the tissue smooths the concentration profile, which is desirable for a drug intended to act over days.{{r|richter2012}} |
| 12 | 12 | ||
| + | 13 | == Anatomy and technique == | |
| + | 14 | The subcutaneous layer lies between the dermis and the muscle fascia, and its thickness varies greatly by site and by individual — from a few millimetres to several centimetres. Needle length is chosen so that the tip reaches this layer without passing into muscle, which is why short needles of 4–8 mm are used in current practice.{{r|ada2024}} | |
| + | 15 | ||
| + | 16 | Injection into muscle rather than fat accelerates absorption, sometimes substantially. For insulin this is a well-documented cause of unexpected hypoglycaemia; for long-acting peptides the consequence is smaller because the absorption step is not rate-limiting. | |
| + | 17 | ||
| 13 | == References == | 18 | == References == |
| 14 | {{reflist}} | 19 | {{reflist}} |