Sterility testing: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 17 → 18·16:04, 28 Aug 2025
Difference between revision 17 and revision 18 of Sterility testing. 2 lines changed; the page grew by 338 bytes.
| Revision 17 — 23:08, 6 Aug 2025 A1c_Alder (talk) add the cross-link to the compendial chapter 4,438 bytes ±0 | Revision 18 — 16:04, 28 Aug 2025 RotationRosalind (talk) rm the claim that the method is stability-indicating without a forced-degradation study 4,776 bytes +338 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 38 | Where a sterility statement does appear on a research-chemical certificate, the questions that make it interpretable are which method was used, how many units were tested, and whether method suitability was demonstrated. Without those, the statement is not connected to any defined level of assurance. | 38 | Where a sterility statement does appear on a research-chemical certificate, the questions that make it interpretable are which method was used, how many units were tested, and whether method suitability was demonstrated. Without those, the statement is not connected to any defined level of assurance. |
| 39 | 39 | ||
| + | 40 | The practical corollary for anyone handling such material is that it should be treated as non-sterile, and the general guidance at [[Reconstitution of lyophilised peptides]] and [[Bacteriostatic water]] proceeds on that basis. Nothing on this wiki is medical advice, and research-use compounds are not approved for human administration. | |
| + | 41 | ||
| 40 | == References == | 42 | == References == |
| 41 | {{reflist}} | 43 | {{reflist}} |