Retention time: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 15 → 16·03:34, 14 Jun 2025
Difference between revision 15 and revision 16 of Retention time. 5 lines changed; the page grew by 428 bytes.
| Revision 15 — 15:15, 20 May 2025 RotationRosalind (talk) add the peptide-content point: area percent alone cannot give a mass 3,336 bytes +30 | Revision 16 — 03:34, 14 Jun 2025 OffLabelOdile (talk) sentence case in headings per PP:MOS 3,764 bytes +428 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 34 | Because of all this, a retention time quoted on a certificate is a within-system value. It is worth reporting — it lets a repeat determination be checked for gross discrepancy — but it is not a transferable identifier.{{r|usp1503}} | 34 | Because of all this, a retention time quoted on a certificate is a within-system value. It is worth reporting — it lets a repeat determination be checked for gross discrepancy — but it is not a transferable identifier.{{r|usp1503}} |
| 35 | 35 | ||
| + | 36 | == Reporting on certificates == | |
| + | 37 | Naming the retention time of the principal peak is a small addition to a certificate and a useful one: it makes the document more checkable without requiring any additional analysis.{{r|usp1503}} | |
| + | 38 | ||
| + | 39 | Certificates that report retention alongside the full method conditions allow a subsequent laboratory to reproduce the separation. Those that report neither report a number that cannot be examined. | |
| + | 40 | ||
| 36 | == References == | 41 | == References == |
| 37 | {{reflist}} | 42 | {{reflist}} |