Gastric emptying: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 16 → 17·08:26, 18 Aug 2025
Difference between revision 16 and revision 17 of Gastric emptying. 2 lines changed; the page grew by 307 bytes.
| Revision 16 — 09:00, 6 Jul 2025 EmptyingElke (talk) attribute the receptor-density claim to the tissue study it comes from 5,258 bytes ±0 | Revision 17 — 08:26, 18 Aug 2025 StubSorterBot (talk) bot: sort category members 5,565 bytes +307 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | It matters where the timing of a peak concentration is what produces the effect — analgesics taken for acute pain, for instance — and where a drug has a narrow therapeutic index and is dosed against a target concentration. The oral contraceptive and levothyroxine are the interactions most often examined; reported effects have generally been modest. | 32 | It matters where the timing of a peak concentration is what produces the effect — analgesics taken for acute pain, for instance — and where a drug has a narrow therapeutic index and is dosed against a target concentration. The oral contraceptive and levothyroxine are the interactions most often examined; reported effects have generally been modest. |
| 33 | 33 | ||
| + | 34 | The reverse consideration also applies. [[Oral semaglutide|Oral semaglutide]] absorption depends on gastric conditions and on a strict fasting window, so anything that alters emptying alters its exposure — including, self-referentially, the delayed emptying produced by the drug itself.{{r|drucker2018}} | |
| + | 35 | ||
| 34 | == References == | 36 | == References == |
| 35 | {{reflist}} | 37 | {{reflist}} |