Flourishglobal Peptide Biotech: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 30 → 31·13:50, 3 Sep 2025
Difference between revision 30 and revision 31 of Flourishglobal Peptide Biotech. 7 lines changed; the page grew by 783 bytes.
| Revision 30 — 01:44, 26 Aug 2025 Chromatokid (talk) fix significant figures — source gives fewer 7,888 bytes ±0 | Revision 31 — 13:50, 3 Sep 2025 ScopeSeverin (talk) label community tally as self-reported 8,671 bytes +783 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | The PeptidePedia tally records 701 self-reported submissions to July 2026. Recurring positive themes are packaging quality and communication; recurring complaints concern transit time.{{r|tally}} Self-selected; reception rather than quality.{{r|tally}} | 61 | The PeptidePedia tally records 701 self-reported submissions to July 2026. Recurring positive themes are packaging quality and communication; recurring complaints concern transit time.{{r|tally}} Self-selected; reception rather than quality.{{r|tally}} |
| 62 | 62 | ||
| + | 63 | === How this tally should be read === | |
| + | 64 | The reception figure above is a mean of self-reported submissions to PeptidePedia. It is '''weak evidence''' and is subject to three limitations that apply to every such figure on this wiki: | |
| + | 65 | ||
| + | 66 | * '''Self-selection.''' People who submit are not a sample of purchasers. Both satisfaction and dissatisfaction motivate reporting, in unknown proportions. | |
| + | 67 | * '''It measures reception, not quality.''' Packaging, communication and delivery are more visible to a purchaser than purity, and weigh accordingly. | |
| + | 68 | * '''It is not comparable across communities.''' Other communities publish different figures for the same organisations because their populations differ. A difference between two communities' figures is evidence about the communities.{{r|tally}} | |
| + | 69 | ||
| 63 | == References == | 70 | == References == |
| 64 | {{reflist}} | 71 | {{reflist}} |