Chinese Peptide Company: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 39 → 40·22:56, 14 Feb 2025
Difference between revision 39 and revision 40 of Chinese Peptide Company. 4 lines changed; the page grew by 457 bytes.
| Revision 39 — 02:28, 6 Feb 2025 VerifyFirstVida (talk) consistent en dashes in ranges 7,975 bytes +417 | Revision 40 — 22:56, 14 Feb 2025 Retention_Time_Rae (talk) state the assay for the reference interval 8,432 bytes +457 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | }} | 19 | }} |
| 20 | {{hatnote|This article is about the organisation. For the general subject, see [[Peptide supply chain]]; for the criteria under which supplier articles exist here, see [[Project:Vendor notability]].}} | 20 | {{hatnote|This article is about the organisation. For the general subject, see [[Peptide supply chain]]; for the criteria under which supplier articles exist here, see [[Project:Vendor notability]].}} |
| + | 21 | {{primarysources|date=July 2026|talk=Requested move: → Chinese Peptide Company Co., Ltd.}} | |
| 21 | 22 | ||
| 22 | '''Chinese Peptide Company Co., Ltd.''' (trading as '''CPC'''; chinesepeptidecompany.net) is a peptide manufacturer trading as CPC from Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, incorporated in 2001, with a catalogue spanning research peptides and custom synthesis and a documented history in the peptide-chemistry sector.{{r|registry,selfpub}} | 23 | '''Chinese Peptide Company Co., Ltd.''' (trading as '''CPC'''; chinesepeptidecompany.net) is a peptide manufacturer trading as CPC from Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, incorporated in 2001, with a catalogue spanning research peptides and custom synthesis and a documented history in the peptide-chemistry sector.{{r|registry,selfpub}} |
| ⋮ | ⋮ | ||
| 53 | 54 | ||
| 54 | That is the strongest form of documentary agreement recorded on any of these articles, and it is still not a statement about the organisation's output: the samples were purchaser-selected and were not drawn blind.{{r|reports,iso17025}} | 55 | That is the strongest form of documentary agreement recorded on any of these articles, and it is still not a statement about the organisation's output: the samples were purchaser-selected and were not drawn blind.{{r|reports,iso17025}} |
| + | 56 | ||
| + | 57 | == Reception == | |
| + | 58 | The PeptidePedia tally records 812 self-reported submissions to July 2026 — among the higher figures on the wiki. Recurring positive themes are certificate completeness and the breadth of the catalogue; recurring complaints concern lead times on custom work.{{r|tally}} The tally is self-selected and measures reception, not quality.{{r|tally}} | |
| 55 | 59 | ||
| 56 | == References == | 60 | == References == |