Certificate of analysis: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 27 → 28·01:26, 14 Aug 2025
Difference between revision 27 and revision 28 of Certificate of analysis. 2 lines changed; the page grew by 365 bytes.
| Revision 27 — 22:02, 22 Jul 2025 TesamorelinTeg (talk) add the cross-link to the traceability article 9,449 bytes ±0 | Revision 28 — 01:26, 14 Aug 2025 Chromatokid (talk) clarify that agreement between certificate and report is a weak finding 9,814 bytes +365 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 68 | First, a certificate that cannot be tied to a physical vial is worth very little: the check a purchaser can perform without any equipment at all is that the lot identifier on the vial, the certificate and the invoice are the same string. | 68 | First, a certificate that cannot be tied to a physical vial is worth very little: the check a purchaser can perform without any equipment at all is that the lot identifier on the vial, the certificate and the invoice are the same string. |
| 69 | 69 | ||
| + | 70 | Second, a certificate issued at manufacture describes the material at manufacture. Where material is held in a regional warehouse and dispatched months later, the interval between the certificate date and the dispatch date is information the certificate does not carry, and it has to be asked for separately. See [[Beyond-use date]] and [[Temperature excursion]]. | |
| + | 71 | ||
| 70 | == References == | 72 | == References == |
| 71 | {{reflist}} | 73 | {{reflist}} |