PeptidePedia The community reference

Body composition assessment (revision 9)

Old revision·18:30, 1 Feb 2025·eGFR_Esme

This is an old revision of this page, as it stood at 18:30, 1 Feb 2025, saved by eGFR_Esme with the summary add the standardisation programme the assay is traceable to. It may differ substantially from the current revision, and any error it contains may since have been corrected.
Body composition assessment
baseline100 kgmonth 680 kgmonth 1270 kgleanfat
Fat and lean compartments change in different proportions during weight loss.
Reference methodsDXA, four-compartment models
Field methodsBioimpedance, skinfolds, circumference
Limitation of weight aloneCannot distinguish the compartments
Analytical method infobox · conventions

Body composition assessment measures the fat and lean compartments of the body separately. Body weight cannot distinguish them, and a given weight change may comprise very different proportions of each.[1]

The reference methods are dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and multi-compartment models combining several measurements. Field methods — bioimpedance, skinfolds, circumference-based equations — are more accessible and considerably less precise.[1]

The question this measurement is usually asked in this field is how much of the weight lost under incretin therapy is lean mass, and whether the proportion differs from that seen with other forms of caloric restriction. See Sarcopenia and Lean mass preservation.[2]

Methods and their precision

[edit]
MethodBasisPrecision for change
DXADifferential X-ray attenuationGood; the practical reference
Four-compartment modelCombines density, water, mineralBest available; research only
BioimpedanceElectrical conductanceSensitive to hydration state
SkinfoldsSubcutaneous thicknessOperator-dependent
Circumference equationsAnthropometric proxiesPopulation-derived; poor for individuals

Bioimpedance is the method most often used outside research and the one whose limitations are least appreciated. It infers composition from conductance, which depends on total body water; changes in hydration produce apparent changes in lean mass that did not occur.[1]

For tracking change in one person, the same method on the same device under the same conditions is worth more than a nominally better method used inconsistently — the same principle that governs a laboratory baseline.[3] Composition measured across a withdrawal period behaves differently again, since the compartments do not regain in the proportions they were lost.[4]

References

  1. ^ a b c Heymsfield SB, Gonzalez MC, Shen W, Redman L, Thomas D. "Weight loss composition is one-fourth fat-free mass: a critical review and critique of this widely cited rule." Obesity Reviews 15(4):310–321 (2014). PMID 24447775.
  2. ^ Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, et al. "Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity." New England Journal of Medicine 384(11):989–1002 (2021). PMID 33567185.
  3. ^ American Diabetes Association. "Standards of Care in Diabetes." Diabetes Care 47(Suppl 1) (2024).
  4. ^ Rubino D, Abrahamsson N, Davies M, et al. "Effect of continued weekly subcutaneous semaglutide vs placebo on weight loss maintenance (STEP 4)." JAMA 325(14):1414–1425 (2021). PMID 33755728.