Aspiration risk under anaesthesia: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 4 → 5·07:30, 2 Dec 2024
Difference between revision 4 and revision 5 of Aspiration risk under anaesthesia. 3 lines changed; the page grew by 269 bytes.
| Revision 4 — 16:51, 16 Nov 2024 AnalyticalAnnie (talk) clarify that dose-dependence is reported for some effects and not others 2,646 bytes +387 | Revision 5 — 07:30, 2 Dec 2024 SurmountSurma (talk) ce per PP:MOS 2,915 bytes +269 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | Gastric ultrasound can assess residual content directly and has been used both to demonstrate the phenomenon and, in practice, to guide individual decisions. It measures the thing of interest rather than a proxy, which is its advantage over any rule based on the drug alone.{{r|joshi2023}} | 17 | Gastric ultrasound can assess residual content directly and has been used both to demonstrate the phenomenon and, in practice, to guide individual decisions. It measures the thing of interest rather than a proxy, which is its advantage over any rule based on the drug alone.{{r|joshi2023}} |
| 18 | 18 | ||
| + | 19 | The relationship between residual content and aspiration is not one-to-one. Aspiration requires content, regurgitation and failure of airway protection, and content alone is a necessary rather than a sufficient condition.{{r|joshi2023}} | |
| + | 20 | ||
| 19 | == References == | 21 | == References == |
| 20 | {{reflist}} | 22 | {{reflist}} |
| ⋮ | ⋮ | ||
| 27 | [[Category:Perioperative considerations]] | 29 | [[Category:Perioperative considerations]] |
| 28 | [[Category:Adverse effects]] | 30 | [[Category:Adverse effects]] |
| + | 31 | [[Category:Clinical practice]] | |
| 29 | 32 |