Aspiration risk under anaesthesia: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 13 → 14·20:32, 23 Jun 2025
Difference between revision 13 and revision 14 of Aspiration risk under anaesthesia. 5 lines changed; the page grew by 466 bytes.
| Revision 13 — 16:01, 31 May 2025 GIP_Genoveva (talk) add the note that titration exists partly to manage these effects 3,911 bytes ±0 | Revision 14 — 20:32, 23 Jun 2025 LeanMassLars (talk) expand §Interpretation 4,377 bytes +466 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 33 | The table describes factors named in published guidance. It is not a protocol, and decisions of this kind belong to the clinicians involved.{{r|ada2024}} | 33 | The table describes factors named in published guidance. It is not a protocol, and decisions of this kind belong to the clinicians involved.{{r|ada2024}} |
| 34 | 34 | ||
| + | 35 | == Interpretation == | |
| + | 36 | The honest position is that a plausible mechanism and supportive imaging exist, outcome evidence does not, and guidance has been cautious in proportion to the severity of the outcome rather than to the strength of the evidence.{{r|joshi2023}} | |
| + | 37 | ||
| + | 38 | That is a defensible way to handle a rare, severe, and mechanistically plausible risk, and it is worth stating explicitly rather than presenting the guidance as though it rested on demonstrated harm. | |
| + | 39 | ||
| 35 | == References == | 40 | == References == |
| 36 | {{reflist}} | 41 | {{reflist}} |