Analytical method validation: difference between revisions
Diff·revision 20 → 21·22:34, 2 Jul 2025
Difference between revision 20 and revision 21 of Analytical method validation. 2 lines changed; the page grew by 268 bytes.
| Revision 20 — 08:57, 3 Jun 2025 MelanocortinMil (talk) close an unbalanced quotation mark 5,074 bytes ±0 | Revision 21 — 22:34, 2 Jul 2025 LedeLeander (talk) correct the flow rate — the source gives it in mL/min 5,342 bytes +268 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | Nor does it transfer between laboratories automatically. A method validated in one laboratory and run in another requires verification that it performs equivalently there — the same characteristics, demonstrated locally. Two laboratories running "the same" method may differ in column lot, instrument dwell volume and mobile-phase preparation. | 40 | Nor does it transfer between laboratories automatically. A method validated in one laboratory and run in another requires verification that it performs equivalently there — the same characteristics, demonstrated locally. Two laboratories running "the same" method may differ in column lot, instrument dwell volume and mobile-phase preparation. |
| 41 | 41 | ||
| + | 42 | For certificates in research-chemical supply, validation status is usually simply unstated. That is a gap in the document rather than a defect in the material, and the correct inference is that the figure is uncharacterised rather than that it is wrong.{{r|usp1503}} | |
| + | 43 | ||
| 42 | == References == | 44 | == References == |
| 43 | {{reflist}} | 45 | {{reflist}} |